Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Liberal's Short Memories

... and they're counting on Canadians having short memories. Unfortunately, too many do.

There's a hew and cry by the liberals and the MSM about the Conservative government appointing partisan judges.
On the liberal website:
Stacking the courts threatens Judicial Independence

You've got to be kidding! Perhaps if you were ethical in any way, you would have changed this when you were in power and wouldn't have lambasted Harper for suggesting otherwise. Idiots.

If memory serves me right and I checked my blog, there was a hew and cry by the liberals and the MSM during the election when Harper had the audacity to suggest that the judges appointed by the previous liberal government were partisan. They suggested that judges were beyond reproach and to suggest otherwise was, well, un-Canadian. My previous blog:

Liberal Dictatorship

Our opposition parties care more about soundbites than actual government and the good of Canada. Harper tried to change this but was blocked and challenged on judge appointment changes all the way by YOU. Which is it? Are judges beyond reproach or are they partisan? Oh, I see, only your appointments were non-partisan? Give me a break.

1 comment:

Al said...

My impression was that Harper was suggesting that we look for judges that have a somewhat tougher attitude towards crime. Are the liberals finally admitting then that they have a "soft" approach to crime rather than a "tough' approach to crime? Is there such a thing as a "neutral" approach to crime? I would be interested in where they really stand as an "approach" to crime. Very confusing. Should turn the whole issue over to a good stand-up comedian.